Document Thumbnail Visualization for Rapid Relevance Judgments: When do They Pay Off?
نویسندگان
چکیده
In a recent experiment, Kaugars (1989) developed a document visualization system that displayed the results of a keyword text search as a set of small graphical representations (thumbnails) of the top 20 retrieved documents laid out in one window and a single document viewer in a second window (See Figure 1). Document thumbnails presented color-coded highlighting indicating positions and identities of search terms in the document, and the single document viewer showed a fish-eye view of the document focused on multiple regions defined by the sentences holding search terms. He compared this system to another more traditional system that represented documents as lists of short titles and a simple scrolled window document viewer. The users judged 8 sets of documents in accordance with relevance judgments supplied with 8 selected TREC-6 topics. The documents and topics were all pre-selected for the users who had no part in selecting query terms or interacting with the retrieval software. Kaugars found that people were faster and better at making relevance judgments for a fixed set of retrieved documents when using the thumbnail/fish-eye system.
منابع مشابه
Visual Analysis of Document Triage Data
As part of the information seeking process, a large amount of effort is invested in order to study and understand how information seekers search through documents such that they can assess their relevance. This search and assessment of document relevance, known as document triage, is an important information seeking process, but is not yet well understood. Human-computer interaction (HCI) and d...
متن کاملPreference Judgments for Relevance
Information retrieval systems have traditionally been evaluated over absolute judgments of relevance: each document is judged for relevance on its own, independent of other documents that may be on topic. We hypothesize that preference judgments of the form “document A is more relevant than document B” are easier for assessors to make than absolute judgments, and provide evidence for our hypoth...
متن کاملHere or There Preference Judgments for Relevance
Information retrieval systems have traditionally been evaluated over absolute judgments of relevance: each document is judged for relevance on its own, independent of other documents that may be on topic. We hypothesize that preference judgments of the form “document A is more relevant than document B” are easier for assessors to make than absolute judgments, and provide evidence for our hypoth...
متن کاملSmartView: Enhanced Document Viewer for Mobile Devices
Web pages with complex layout do not display well on small screens. They are difficult to read on mobile devices such as PDAs or Web enabled phones because they require extensive horizontal scrolling. SmartView is a browser feature that performs partitioning of an HTML document content into logical sections. Individual sections can be selected by the user for viewing independently from the rest...
متن کاملUser perspectives on relevance criteria: A comparison among relevant, partially relevant, and not-relevant judgments
Citability abstract can be cited instead of the full text document “But I might still cite it just based off the abstract.” Informativeness abstract’s ability to represent information found in the full text document “This is good that they have this abstract . . . because they describe their findings in some detail.” “It didn’t . . . give me enough information to make a real informed decision.”
متن کامل